© 2024 TRUSTBYTES. All Rights Reserved.
Collateralized Debt Positions (CDPs) are essential in DeFi for enabling asset-backed borrowing and lending, but they also present significant security challenges that require vigilant auditing practices, robust oracle systems, and comprehensive risk management to protect against common vulnerabilities and exploits.
Collateralized Debt Positions (CDPs) are a cornerstone of decentralized finance (DeFi), enabling users to leverage assets for borrowing and lending. While they offer significant benefits such as decentralization, scalability, and capital efficiency, CDPs also present unique security challenges. This article explores the intricacies of CDP protocols, the common vulnerabilities they face, and provides a practical checklist for auditors to enhance their security assessments.
The rapid growth of DeFi has popularized the use of Collateralized Debt Positions (CDPs), a concept borrowed from traditional finance and first implemented in the DeFi space by MakerDAO with the introduction of the DAI stablecoin. CDPs allow users to lock collateral in smart contracts to borrow assets, typically resulting in the creation of new tokens or facilitating loans. This article delves into how CDPs function, classifies their features, and examines typical security flaws identified through audits and real-world hacks. Finally, we offer a checklist to guide auditors in securing CDP protocols.
A Collateralized Debt Position (CDP) is a financial instrument used in DeFi that allows users to lock assets in a smart contract to mint or borrow other assets. CDPs are pivotal in two primary types of DeFi protocols:
CDPs provide several advantages:
As of now, the Total Value Locked (TVL) in lending and CDP protocols stands at $23.6 billion, surpassing other DeFi categories like liquid staking, decentralized exchanges (DEXs), and bridges .
Understanding user interactions with CDP protocols is crucial for grasping their security implications. Here are the main scenarios:
In DeFi, unlike traditional finance where loans may be unsecured, users must provide collateral worth more than the loan amount to borrow funds. This ensures that the protocol can cover its losses if the collateral's value drops. The collateral-to-debt ratio is known as the Collateral Ratio (CR).
To close a borrowing position, the user must repay the borrowed amount plus any accrued interest. Interest rates can be fixed or variable, affecting the overall cost of the loan and the returns to lenders.
If the collateral's value falls below a certain threshold, the protocol triggers liquidation to prevent losses. Liquidation methods include:
Liquidation processes ensure the protocol remains solvent and creditors are repaid, often incentivized by a liquidation bonus.
Users can supply liquidity by depositing funds into a pool, earning interest based on the pool’s utilization ratio. This ratio reflects the proportion of borrowed to available funds, influencing the interest rate and liquidity dynamics within the protocol.
CDP protocols can be classified by various features, which impact their security and functionality:
Some CDP protocols allow users to leverage their collateral in third-party platforms for additional rewards, though this introduces extra risk layers.
CDP protocols have been frequent targets for exploits, revealing several recurring vulnerabilities:
Issue: The price calculation method used the balanceOf()
function, allowing attackers to manipulate prices with a flash loan.Impact: This led to incorrect price feeds and exploited borrowing conditions.
Issue: Lack of checks on the health ratio during collateral and debt token issuance allowed users to create unlimited debt.Impact: Enabled users to manipulate their collateral and debt positions, leading to protocol instability.
Issue: Manipulation of the total APE tokens locked by the protocol allowed attackers to alter their staking balances using flash loans.Impact: Resulted in inflated token balances and unauthorized borrowing.
Issue: Vulnerability in the LP token price calculation formula allowed attackers to manipulate collateral prices using flash loans.Impact: Led to incorrect collateral valuations and exploitative loans.
Issue: Reliance on a small TWAP window allowed attackers to artificially inflate token prices for low-liquidity governance tokens.Impact: Enabled borrowing against overvalued collateral, causing significant losses.
Auditors should consider the following when assessing CDP protocols:
For a detailed checklist, visit: Decurity's CDP Protocol Audit Checklist
The security of CDP protocols is crucial for the stability and growth of the DeFi ecosystem. By understanding the typical vulnerabilities and implementing robust audit practices, we can mitigate risks and foster a safer environment for decentralized financial activities. As DeFi continues to evolve, ongoing vigilance and adaptation are key to safeguarding these innovative financial systems.
For further insights on Web3 security and engagement with top-tier smart contract auditors, join our TRUSTBYTES Discord.