Flash Loan Attacks: Implications and Attack Avoidance in Web3

Introduction

The exponential growth of decentralized finance (DeFi) has transformed the Web3 ecosystem, introducing groundbreaking innovations that mimic aspects of traditional finance while leveraging the advantages of blockchain technology. Ethereum, the most prominent blockchain in DeFi, has played a key role in this transformation, bringing unprecedented financial flexibility and opportunities. However, these innovations also come with new security vulnerabilities, making DeFi a double-edged sword.

As of August 2024, $84 billion in assets is locked in DeFi protocols, down from a peak of nearly $180 billion in November 2021. Despite this decline, DeFi remains an attractive target for malicious actors, primarily due to the novel features such as flash loans. Flash loans allow for rapid, uncollateralized borrowing, but have been exploited for massive financial gain by hackers, leading to serious protocol vulnerabilities.

This article will delve into the concept of flash loans, their implications, and most importantly, strategies to avoid attacks leveraging flash loans. It is critical for Web3 security researchers, audit firms, and smart contract developers to understand the complexities and risks of flash loan attacks to safeguard the integrity of their protocols.

What are Flash Loans?

Flash loans represent one of the most innovative yet dangerous advancements within the DeFi landscape. A flash loan allows a user to borrow significant amounts of assets without collateral, provided that the loan is repaid within a single blockchain transaction. This innovation is only possible due to blockchain’s atomicity, meaning the series of actions (borrowing, performing operations, and repayment) either all occur successfully, or none do. If repayment fails, the entire transaction is reverted.

Flash Loan Workflow:

1. Loan Initiation: The borrower requests a loan from a DeFi protocol like Aave or dYdX without providing any collateral.
2. Execution: The borrowed assets can be used for any financial operations such as arbitrage, collateral swaps, or liquidation.
3. Repayment: The loan must be repaid, plus any fees, within the same blockchain transaction.
4. Reversion: If repayment doesn’t occur, the blockchain reverts the entire transaction, ensuring the lender's assets are not lost.

Although flash loans are useful for arbitrage and liquidity management, they have been weaponized in various attacks, significantly impacting the DeFi ecosystem.

Blockchain Atomicity

The key to understanding flash loans is blockchain atomicity, which guarantees that all actions in a transaction either succeed or fail together. The Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) processes transactions in blocks, and within these blocks, all operations must complete for the transaction to be valid.

This characteristic enables a flash loan to function without the risk of default. Since all operations happen within a single block, the borrower can perform arbitrage or other financial activities and repay the loan within milliseconds. However, this mechanism also introduces the potential for abuse when combined with other vulnerabilities in smart contracts, such as price manipulation through oracles.

Flash Loan Implications: Legitimate Use and Attacks

Legitimate Use Cases of Flash Loans:

• Arbitrage: Traders exploit price discrepancies between different exchanges or pools to profit without needing capital upfront.
• Collateral Swaps: Flash loans enable users to rebalance collateral without repaying existing loans, thus avoiding liquidation.
• Liquidation: Flash loans can be used to liquidate undercollateralized positions profitably.

Exploiting Flash Loans in Attacks:The same features that make flash loans beneficial for legitimate financial strategies can also facilitate complex attacks. Malicious actors can leverage flash loans for price manipulation, market arbitrage, or protocol manipulation.

Flash Loan Exploits: Oracle Manipulation

One of the most notorious forms of flash loan exploits involves oracle price manipulation. Oracles are services that provide external data, such as asset prices, to smart contracts. When these oracles use on-chain liquidity pools as price references, attackers can exploit the liquidity to manipulate the price for their gain.

How Oracle Price Manipulation Works:

1. The attacker takes out a large flash loan.
2. They use the loan to manipulate prices in a liquidity pool that an oracle relies on for price feeds.
3. The oracle reports the manipulated price to the smart contract, allowing the attacker to profit, e.g., by borrowing assets based on inflated collateral value or by triggering the liquidation of other users' positions.
4. The attacker repays the flash loan and walks away with a profit, while the protocol or its users bear the financial loss.

Consequences of Flash Loan Attacks

Flash loan attacks can have devastating effects on DeFi protocols:

• Significant Financial Losses: Protocols can lose millions of dollars when exploited through flash loan attacks, as seen in several high-profile incidents.
• Undermined Trust: Once a protocol is exploited, it can lose users’ trust, which is difficult to regain.
• Market Impact: Flash loan attacks can create volatility across multiple markets, especially when manipulation targets major liquidity pools or tokens.

Defense Mechanisms Against Flash Loan Exploits

To mitigate the risks of flash loan attacks, several defense mechanisms can be implemented:

1. Multiple Oracles: Using a combination of price oracles (such as Chainlink and multiple AMMs) can prevent manipulation by requiring multiple price sources to verify data.
   • Further Reading: https://chain.link/solutions/defi
2. Slippage Controls: Limiting the slippage in trades can minimize price manipulation within liquidity pools. If slippage exceeds a certain threshold, transactions should be blocked.
3. Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP): Instead of relying on spot prices, which are vulnerable to manipulation, protocols can use TWAP. TWAP smooths out short-term price fluctuations, making it difficult for attackers to profit from brief price spikes.
   • Further Reading: https://uniswap.org/docs/v2/advanced-topics/using-twaps
4. Collateral Requirements: Implementing strict requirements for collateral in transactions involving oracles can reduce the potential for inflated borrowing based on manipulated prices.
5. Circuit Breakers: Protocols can introduce circuit breakers that pause certain operations if unusual activity is detected, such as sudden price changes or unusual trading volume.

Case Study: The 2020 bZx Flash Loan Attack

In February 2020, the bZx protocol was hit by a flash loan attack that resulted in the loss of $350,000. The attacker used a flash loan to manipulate the price of the underlying collateral in an oracle, allowing them to borrow far more than the collateral was worth. This incident highlighted the need for robust defense mechanisms such as multiple oracles and price smoothing through TWAP.

Read more about this incident here: https://rekt.news/bzx-hack-february-2020

Conclusion

Flash loans are a powerful tool in decentralized finance, but their potential for misuse poses serious challenges to DeFi protocols. Security researchers, auditors, and smart contract developers must continuously evolve their understanding of these mechanisms and implement advanced defenses against emerging threats. Multiple oracles, slippage controls, and TWAP mechanisms are crucial in mitigating the risk of flash loan attacks, but ongoing vigilance is required to keep protocols secure in this fast-paced landscape.

Recommendations:

To stay ahead of flash loan attacks and other security vulnerabilities, Web3 professionals should actively engage with security tools, participate in DeFi communities, and keep abreast of the latest security techniques. Implementing a multi-layered defense strategy can greatly reduce the risk of exploitation.

For further insights on the Web3 security space and engagement with top-tier smart contract auditors in the industry, join our TRUSTBYTES Discord.

‍